Gael Monfils vs Jiri Lehecka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In terms of second serve performance over the past six months, Monfils has displayed a slight advantage, winning 50.37% of points on his second serve, compared to Lehecka's 46.86%. This statistic has proven to be significantly correlated with match prediction accuracy. A comprehensive analysis of their return game stats reveals that Monfils has won 44.19% of his opponent's second serve points, closely followed by Lehecka at 43.32%. For first serve returns, the numbers stand at 21.27% for Monfils and 18.86% for Lehecka, offering a strong basis for predicting the favorite in this head-to-head encounter.

Analyzing player performance under pressure, Monfils has saved 57.24% of breakpoints in contrast to Lehecka's 55.66%, providing valuable insight for in-game betting predictions. Looking at the past year, Monfils has emerged victorious in 60.87% of his matches (W/L 28/18), whereas Lehecka boasts a slightly higher winning percentage at 63.83% (W/L 30/17). This gives us an overall head-to-head prediction overview between the two players.

Examining surface preferences, Monfils's career best win rate is 69% (W/L 155/69) on indoor hard courts, whereas grass surfaces have proven to be more challenging, with a 58% win rate (W/L 46/33). Conversely, Lehecka performs best on clay, achieving a 64% win rate (W/L 97/55), while grass remains his weaker surface with a 45% win rate (W/L 5/6). Over the last year, Monfils has primarily competed in the Masters series, winning 55.56% of his matches (W/L 10/8), in contrast to Lehecka's higher win rate of 70.83% on the Main tour (W/L 17/7). When making predictions, it is crucial to consider the event level at which these matches took place.

In their direct head-to-head encounters, Lehecka has had the upper hand, winning their only match convincingly with a 2-0 set record against Monfils. Their last meeting was at the Banja Luka Open on clay, where Lehecka emerged victorious with a score of 6-4, 6-3, lasting an average match time of 1:19:4. In extreme pressure situations, neither player has played a tiebreak against each other, keeping the outcome unpredictable should they reach such a scenario.

Opponent quality stats indicate that Monfils has faced players with an average rank of 70.22, whereas Lehecka's opponents averaged a higher rank of 59.38 in the past 12 months. This suggests Lehecka's exposure to stronger competition. If the match extends to a deciding set, a noteworthy statistic is that Monfils has won 71% of deciding sets over the last year, compared to Lehecka's 60%. Additionally, Monfils has managed to convert 27.83% of his breakpoint opportunities, outperforming Lehecka's 21.43% conversion rate.

Given these statistical insights, Monfils holds a slight edge in key performance metrics and the ability to handle pressure, making him the likely favorite to win the upcoming match.